<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Laura Creekmore &#187; context</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lauracreekmore.com/tag/context/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lauracreekmore.com</link>
	<description>Content strategy consulting, training and speaking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 02:14:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Context Is Always Critical</title>
		<link>http://www.lauracreekmore.com/context-is-always-critical/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lauracreekmore.com/context-is-always-critical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 03:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Creekmore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Information management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[context]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lauracreekmore.com/?p=152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Got into an interesting back-channel discussion today in the South by Southwest session called &#8220;Beyond Algorithms: Search and the Semantic Web.&#8221; I did write another post on the panel, so I won&#8217;t go into the details here, except to say that I found the backchannel more thought-provoking than the panel itself. So when I got [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got into an interesting back-channel discussion today in the South by Southwest session called &#8220;Beyond Algorithms: Search and the Semantic Web.&#8221;</p>
<p>I did write another <a href="http://www.lauracreekmore.com/2010/03/14/143/">post on the panel</a>, so I won&#8217;t go into the details here, except to say that I found the backchannel more thought-provoking than the panel itself.</p>
<p>So when I got into the session, I realized I had left my power cord in the hotel room and I was running on reserve power. I sent a tweet to ask if anyone in the rather large ballroom had a Mac power cord I could borrow.</p>
<p>I quickly heard back from <a href="http://twitter.com/callsignbentley">Tim Bentley</a>, who was generous to share his power cord with me for the session. And so it was coincidental, certainly, when I noticed he&#8217;d come from Aardvark, a social search engine.</p>
<p>I think it was during the part of the panel where they were discussing how standard search engines don&#8217;t really know if they&#8217;ve answered your question, and Bentley tweeted to say this:</p>
<blockquote><p><em><a title="#beyondalgorithms" rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/search?q=%23beyondalgorithms">#beyondalgorithms</a> panel is basically talking about how to do algorithmically what  Aardvark is doing now socially</em></p></blockquote>
<p>So a few minutes later, I started wondering about Bentley&#8217;s perspective on Wolfram|Alpha, which bills itself as a &#8220;computational knowledge engine&#8221; and promotes the fact that its information is curated by experts. I have a long-standing bias against people who purport to be &#8220;experts&#8221; &#8212; it&#8217;s a knee-jerk sort of reaction and I can acknowledge that.</p>
<p>On the panel, a tangential discussion cropped up about how much context matters in search. It was the sort of conversation that I was far more interested in than the topics they actually intended to discuss. So it got me thinking that it&#8217;s not expert curation or knowledge that I dispute &#8212; it&#8217;s so-called expert knowledge applied without regard to context.</p>
<p>There are so few questions in this world with a black and white answer. Once you go beyond 2+2=4, you need to know the context to answer. And then most expert opinion can sound downright asinine when it ignores context.</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s the kind of question I&#8217;d like to see explored deeply: <strong>How do we apply context to computer inputs [searches, using the computer, applications, whatever] in order to more accurately and efficiently reach solutions for users?</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lauracreekmore.com/context-is-always-critical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

